Found 72 bookmarks
Newest
The best explanation I have ever heard of the New York Times' editorial line throughout its history is that it's not a left-wing newspaper, or a right wing newspaper, but an *establishment* newspaper. It will always side with the establishment, meaning whoever is currently in
The best explanation I have ever heard of the New York Times' editorial line throughout its history is that it's not a left-wing newspaper, or a right wing newspaper, but an *establishment* newspaper. It will always side with the establishment, meaning whoever is currently in
·x.com·
The best explanation I have ever heard of the New York Times' editorial line throughout its history is that it's not a left-wing newspaper, or a right wing newspaper, but an *establishment* newspaper. It will always side with the establishment, meaning whoever is currently in
NYT dutifully liberal-washes Trump’s bombing of Venezuela and abduction of its leader by embracing the “captured” framework. Maduro isn’t wanted by any international or legitimate legal regime, his “fugitive” status is pure assertion by only one UN member state out of 193.
NYT dutifully liberal-washes Trump’s bombing of Venezuela and abduction of its leader by embracing the “captured” framework. Maduro isn’t wanted by any international or legitimate legal regime, his “fugitive” status is pure assertion by only one UN member state out of 193.
·x.com·
NYT dutifully liberal-washes Trump’s bombing of Venezuela and abduction of its leader by embracing the “captured” framework. Maduro isn’t wanted by any international or legitimate legal regime, his “fugitive” status is pure assertion by only one UN member state out of 193.
Only toward the end of this article does NYT speculate that maybe some people turned against Israel after seeing massive war crimes committed by the Israeli army rather than antisemitism. And even then it was couched in the language of those crimes being a social media conspiracy
Only toward the end of this article does NYT speculate that maybe some people turned against Israel after seeing massive war crimes committed by the Israeli army rather than antisemitism. And even then it was couched in the language of those crimes being a social media conspiracy
·x.com·
Only toward the end of this article does NYT speculate that maybe some people turned against Israel after seeing massive war crimes committed by the Israeli army rather than antisemitism. And even then it was couched in the language of those crimes being a social media conspiracy
Mondoweiss on Instagram: "More than 300 writers, scholars, and public figures are boycotting the New York Times Opinion section until three demands are met. The coalition accuses the Times of anti-Palestinian bias in its Gaza war coverage, including reprinting Israeli government claims as fact, avoiding terms like "ethnic cleansing," and maintaining staff ties to Israeli military and lobby groups. 🔗 in bio to read the full statement."
Mondoweiss on Instagram: "More than 300 writers, scholars, and public figures are boycotting the New York Times Opinion section until three demands are met. The coalition accuses the Times of anti-Palestinian bias in its Gaza war coverage, including reprinting Israeli government claims as fact, avoiding terms like "ethnic cleansing," and maintaining staff ties to Israeli military and lobby groups. 🔗 in bio to read the full statement."
·instagram.com·
Mondoweiss on Instagram: "More than 300 writers, scholars, and public figures are boycotting the New York Times Opinion section until three demands are met. The coalition accuses the Times of anti-Palestinian bias in its Gaza war coverage, including reprinting Israeli government claims as fact, avoiding terms like "ethnic cleansing," and maintaining staff ties to Israeli military and lobby groups. 🔗 in bio to read the full statement."
19 months of famine later ICJ makes clear the “UNRWA Hamas” lie pushed by the NYT and WSJ was total horseshit and Israel refused to provide any evidence whatsoever. But thankfully western media helped launder “Israeli intelligence” in an effort to condemn 100,000s to starvation
19 months of famine later ICJ makes clear the “UNRWA Hamas” lie pushed by the NYT and WSJ was total horseshit and Israel refused to provide any evidence whatsoever. But thankfully western media helped launder “Israeli intelligence” in an effort to condemn 100,000s to starvation
·x.com·
19 months of famine later ICJ makes clear the “UNRWA Hamas” lie pushed by the NYT and WSJ was total horseshit and Israel refused to provide any evidence whatsoever. But thankfully western media helped launder “Israeli intelligence” in an effort to condemn 100,000s to starvation
‘The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases”’—This NYT memo was issued in November and has been regularly updated since. It shows that despite all the criticism, they are resolutely anti-Palestinian and committed to this genocide.
‘The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases”’—This NYT memo was issued in November and has been regularly updated since. It shows that despite all the criticism, they are resolutely anti-Palestinian and committed to this genocide.
·x.com·
‘The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases”’—This NYT memo was issued in November and has been regularly updated since. It shows that despite all the criticism, they are resolutely anti-Palestinian and committed to this genocide.
this is the worst thing the NYT has published since the discredited Oct 7 rape story and that's saying something. There is no excuse for this, and in this moment, are you fucking kidding me? Shame on AIPAC stooge Bret Stephens and shame on the New York Times, beyond disgraceful
this is the worst thing the NYT has published since the discredited Oct 7 rape story and that's saying something. There is no excuse for this, and in this moment, are you fucking kidding me? Shame on AIPAC stooge Bret Stephens and shame on the New York Times, beyond disgraceful
·x.com·
this is the worst thing the NYT has published since the discredited Oct 7 rape story and that's saying something. There is no excuse for this, and in this moment, are you fucking kidding me? Shame on AIPAC stooge Bret Stephens and shame on the New York Times, beyond disgraceful