israelly-over
The best explanation I have ever heard of the New York Times' editorial line throughout its history is that it's not a left-wing newspaper, or a right wing newspaper, but an *establishment* newspaper. It will always side with the establishment, meaning whoever is currently in
hey fck nyt
richest man ever
There is truly nobody more morally bankrupt in this world than New York Times columnists.
The New York Times would like you to rest easy and know that the elite world outlined in the Epstein files doesn’t really exist anymore!
They’re building resorts on the graves of children and Palestinian men and women slaughtered in a genocide—for profit—and @nytimes calls it a “Glittering Plan.”
Only the @nytimes would print a headline this twisted. Bondi Beach has nothing to do with the Palestinian struggle, and to say it does is journalistic malpractice.
NYT dutifully liberal-washes Trump’s bombing of Venezuela and abduction of its leader by embracing the “captured” framework. Maduro isn’t wanted by any international or legitimate legal regime, his “fugitive” status is pure assertion by only one UN member state out of 193.
Thinking about when Elon’s classmates tried to kill him and even his dad was like ok yeah fair enough
Elon's entire reason in buying Twitter was to create a safe space for pedos and Nazis
I guess it kinda makes sense that the first trillionaire is the biggest loser of all time
Elon Musk used AI to generate a woman prepared to tell him “I will always love you”, and caused an epidemic of cringe – 21 scorching human-made burns
Elon Musk just debated an 87-year-old author and lost
"Wherever he goes, he wants to leave" that's because when he gets there, he has brought his own self along; & whatever club he's invited to join has been devalued by the invitation. | "Wherever he goes, he wants to leave: South Africa, Canada, ultimately the US in the long run, based on his behavior. This also includes Earth. A continuous disavowal of your home is odd, to say the least. He seems to have no capacity for a normal level of appreciation.
Only toward the end of this article does NYT speculate that maybe some people turned against Israel after seeing massive war crimes committed by the Israeli army rather than antisemitism. And even then it was couched in the language of those crimes being a social media conspiracy
Nothing to see here, just the New York Times actually justifying Israel’s ban on humanitarian orgs—like Doctors Without Borders and Save the Children—that provide life-saving support to Palestinians.
Insects Matter. Why Are We Wiping Them Out? | Earth.Org